Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Dynamic Wealth Bridge
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-17 15:41:29
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (52)
Related
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- The Daily Money: Americans are ditching their cars
- Blake Lively Reacts to Ryan Reynolds Divorce Rumors
- Trump holds first rally with running mate JD Vance
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- The Mitsubishi Starion and Chrysler conquest are super rad and rebadged
- Andrew Garfield's Girlfriend Kate Tomas Calls Out Misogynistic Reactions to Their Romance
- Wildfires: 1 home burned as flames descends on a Southern California neighborhood
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Cell phones, clothes ... rent? Inflation pushes teens into the workforce
Ranking
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Utah death row inmate who is imprisoned for 1998 murder asks parole board for mercy ahead of hearing
- Biden’s withdrawal injects uncertainty into wars, trade disputes and other foreign policy challenges
- National bail fund returns to Georgia after judge says limits were arbitrary
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Mega Millions winning numbers for July 19 drawing: Jackpot now worth $279 million
- Vice President Kamala Harris leads list of contenders for spots on the Democratic ticket
- 3 'missing' people found safe, were never in car when it was submerged off Texas pier, police say
Recommendation
Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
Air travel delays continue, though most airlines have recovered from global tech outage
Full transcript of Face the Nation, July 21, 2024
National bail fund returns to Georgia after judge says limits were arbitrary
Could your smelly farts help science?
What is an open convention?
Democrats promise ‘orderly process’ to replace Biden, where Harris is favored but questions remain
U.S. travel advisory level to Bangladesh raised after police impose shoot-on-sight curfew amid protests